You are here: Home >Archive for the ‘Biomechanics And Structural Integration’ Category

Quality And The Concept of Zero Error

In the real world of the Economy, there is a word for maximum effort and maximum commitment, it is simply called Quality. Quality is a multi-million $ industry, through trainings and seminars, throughout the world. Once a company signs up for Quality trainings, it starts at the higher management staff first, and then the same [...]

Tags: , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The Ostrich way

I must admit that my communications have been rather inefficient with the community so far, trying to address those issues to a wide variety of professionals of Structural Integration, a majority of which are not interested by the subject, simply because they won’t purchase in the near future a computerized video system to document their [...]

Tags: , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The Grand Court of Science, The American Society of Biomechanics

I was very surprised to see NO REFERENCE to Ida Rolf or Structural Integration, or Rolfing in this FREE FORUM OPEN TO ANYONE. If I searched correctly, no member (out of 40,000!) is a Roofer, or a Structural Integrator, or a school of SI. Some suppliers seem to know of Rolfing, but we shine by [...]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Credibility Issue, The promotion of Quality Data And Full Data Disclosure

This question is going to be more and more crucial to our community. What is more important: having a computerized software that gives us merely a clear image (such as our current systems at both the Guild and the Rolf Institute), so that both client and practitioners can self indulge in projecting what they already [...]

Tags: , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
Copyright © 2010Biomechanics and Structural Integration All Right Reserved.